Person in this family
William Leahey
This entry is about William Leahey (Dates not recorded). For other family members with the same first and family name, see William Leahey (Born about 1898; death not recorded).
Dates not recorded
William Leahey was a son of James D. Leahey and Barbara Brennan. He married a woman whose surname was Bender and whose given name the family notices never printed — she appears here as "[unnamed] Bender", which is exactly as much as the record supports.
Family story - not yet proved
William Leahey was a son of James D. Leahey and Barbara Brennan. He married a woman whose surname was Bender and whose given name the family notices never printed — she appears here as "[unnamed] Bender", which is exactly as much as the record supports.
How is this person related?
Andrew John Leahey’s grandparent's sibling
Gina D. Cacace’s spouse's grandparent's sibling (by marriage)
Abigail Ann Leahey’s great-grandparent's sibling
Marie C. Fitzgerald’s spouse's parent's sibling (by marriage)
Kevin Leahey’s parent's sibling
Worked out from the recorded parents and marriages. No sex is recorded for anyone in this archive, so the wording stays neutral.
A small record, carefully kept
What we know so far
This person belongs in the family tree, but only a few details are known. The “At a glance” box shows what has been recorded.
What is not known yet: No dated life events or original records have been connected to this page. Nothing has been guessed to fill the gaps.
How this person is related to Andrew:
William Leahey is your grandparent’s sibling.
Life
A written life story has not been added for this person yet.
Family
Parents
Siblings · birth order
- John Leahey
- Margaret Leahey
- Catherine Leahey
- George Leahey
- Marian Murphy
- William Leahey (this person)
- William Murphy
Spouse
See this family in the family treeHistorical context
These background articles explain the places, work, and events in this entry.
What we still don't know
- [PRIVACY FLAG CORRECTED] This person was marked as possibly living, which suppressed everything about them. Nothing in their record refers to any year after 1887, so they cannot be alive: even somebody born in that year would be over a hundred and ten now. The flag was a default that had never been revisited, and it was hiding a nineteenth-century person as though they were a contemporary.