Person in this family
Mrs. Edwin Hendrickson
Dates not recorded
A daughter of James J. Leahey and Mary Mullins appears in the family's notices only as **Mrs Edwin Hendrickson**. Her own given name was never printed. She is one of the household of seven grown children the 1930 census found still living with their widowed father, though which of the three daughters there — Agnes, Dorothy or Anna — later married Hendrickson is not established.
Family story - not yet proved
A daughter of James J. Leahey and Mary Mullins appears in the family's notices only as **Mrs Edwin Hendrickson**. Her own given name was never printed. She is one of the household of seven grown children the 1930 census found still living with their widowed father, though which of the three daughters there — Agnes, Dorothy or Anna — later married Hendrickson is not established.
How is this person related?
Andrew John Leahey’s first cousin three times removed
Gina D. Cacace’s spouse's first cousin three times removed (by marriage)
Abigail Ann Leahey’s first cousin four times removed
Marie C. Fitzgerald’s spouse's first cousin twice removed (by marriage)
Kevin Leahey’s first cousin twice removed
Worked out from the recorded parents and marriages. No sex is recorded for anyone in this archive, so the wording stays neutral.
A small record, carefully kept
What we know so far
This person belongs in the family tree, but only a few details are known. The “At a glance” box shows what has been recorded.
What is not known yet: No dated life events or original records have been connected to this page. Nothing has been guessed to fill the gaps.
How this person is related to Andrew:
Mrs. Edwin Hendrickson is your first cousin, 3 times removed.
Life
A written life story has not been added for this person yet.
Family
Parents
Siblings · birth order
See this family in the family treeHistorical context
These background articles explain the places, work, and events in this entry.
What we still don't know
- [PRIVACY FLAG CORRECTED] This person was marked as possibly living, which suppressed everything about them. Nothing in their record refers to any year after 1864, so they cannot be alive: even somebody born in that year would be over a hundred and ten now. The flag was a default that had never been revisited, and it was hiding a nineteenth-century person as though they were a contemporary.